The last session of the day was chosen solely on its ballsy, provocative title: “Brand Consistency is Killing Digital Advertising.” Now this just seemed intentionally inflammatory. And even up to the moment the guy started talking I was ready to bolt in case it turned into overly cerebral planner talk.

Then the guy started talking, Justin Cox, a planner from Pereira & O’Dell.

And I dug it

Methodically, he challenged everything I’ve been led to believe in the last 5 years about how integrated marketing should work, ye ol’ hub and spoke, the 360° campaign, every channel serving the same big idea. He showed a slide of cross channel pieces from a recent Gillette campaign. From the print, to the TV, to the display banners, everything looked exactly the same, sharing the same art direction and assets and messaging. And it was easy to see. It all added up to crap. Consistency did not, as I’ve espoused to many clients, amplify their message; rather it seemed pointless and trivial.

Repetition diluted any possible hope of more meaningful engagement.

And then he made his big, bold claim.  Across channels, brands don’t need to look the same, they just need to feel the same.

Think about Google. From search, to Gmail, to mobile apps, to Chrome, their customer touch points are all over the place. But there is always a consistent feel of cool innovation. Google-ness always comes through.

So how do you help your client build a successfully inconsistent brand? It’s a 7 step process.

1. Redefine integration from cloning a message to expressing a common feel, or sharing a common goal.

2. Make sure your customers know what to expect from your product, not your brand. Think Red Bull. Their marketing exposure is everywhere—from those tired animated TV spots, to their eclectic motorsports sponsorships, to their flug-tags. Their brand continually surprises and delights their customers. But the product stays consistent.

3. Sometimes it makes sense to make your product the star, not a monolithic brand message. Consider the award winning Curiously Strong Altoids campaign of the 90s. Brilliant copywriting, brilliant art direction. But customers got so used to the brutal brand consistency, the campaign became transparent and sales plummeted for 3 straight years.

4. Define everything through the customer behavior. Place being relevant to a customer’s lifestyle at a higher premium than message consistency. This is diligent media strategy.

5. Embrace the unique strengths of technology. Don’t be seduced by campaign centric oversimplification. It is ridiculous to think an emotionally engaging print piece will translate well into interactive. Leverage the unique properties of each channel.

6. Adapt a meme mentality. Be relevant in real time. Be immediate.

7. Take a break from the single-minded message.

He ended with a good quote, maybe too perfect:

“Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative.” -Oscar Wilde

Now this might not be the beginning of an industry-wide revolution. This idea certainly isn’t appropriate for every brief, nor every brand. But it is a powerful argument. And I have it for when I need it.

Jim Kim is a Creative Director out of our Chicago office.

  • http://www.tommartin.typepad.com tom martin

    Not so sure I can jump on this bandwagon with both feet. A few thoughts.

    First, seeing the entirety of an online campaign or integrated campaign all units right next to each other isn’t giving you a real impression. The consumer never sees all of those elements that way. If you’re lucky, they see them every so often, so I’d say it IS important to maintain graphic congruency in order to aid a consumer’s brain in the identify/classify process.

    Second, to blame the Altoids sales drop on its advertising is tossing aside the real market conditions that existed at the time, namely Listerine introducing an entirely new package — small, powerful and fits in your pocket. As I recall, Altoids struggled for some time to come up with a similar package and in the meantime, lost sales.

    You’ve got some good points here re: don’t just copy/paste a look/feel/message and call it integrated or effective… but I wouldn’t be so fast to throw out the baby with the bathwater.

    @TomMartin

  • http://www.critcalmass.com Jim Kim

    I don’t think anyone’s ready to throw out the contents of our bathtub just yet. Integrated advertising is still too much in its early years to walk away from, or shun in such a generalized manner. We still see mind-numbingly brilliant integrated campaigns (hello, Mr. Old Spice) and their power is indisputable. But at the other end of the spectrum are weak ideas (hey Gillette) being shoe-horned across channels with no regard for what constitutes a great engaging experience specific to that device/channel. That’s where brand and/or campaign consistency kills kittens and the imaginations of little children everywhere.

    At this point, this is really just an argument for when you need to fight back against, “Make the digital look just like the print.” Uggh.

  • http://blog.marketing-soc.org.uk/2011/04/magpie-daniele-fiandaca-digital-fauna-3/ Magpie: Daniele Fiandaca, Digital Fauna – The Marketing Society

    [...] to move away from consistency of messaging to one of context for a while but not as eloquently as this piece on why brand consistency is killing digital [...]

blog comments powered by Disqus