
If you are reading this then you are using your body.
If you vote, you do that with your body, too.
Actually, let's skip the dualism, your body is you. Somehow, a large percentage of people in this country have forgotten that idea. That their bodies are theirs but that yours is yours.
These people remember.
Sometimes people just need a simple reminder so you might want to pass this, and the one below, along. And another lest-we-forget, in order to get and keep jobs and earn money and participate in the economy, women need to control their reproduction, safely and legally, and have access to health care that includes their reproductive organs. You know, the ones in their bodies. Even if men don't have the same ones in theirs.
If a person cannot control her own reproduction, well, really what can she control? What good are all your other rights if your right to control your own body and reproduction is denied? How else do you think we are ever going to deal pervasive gender inequities in the business world? Pathetic representation of women in government? You know what "glass ceilings" are held up by? Systemic complementarianism enabled by legislatively enforced reproductive injustice. There are so many people so deeply bound to a conservative, religiously-inspired belief that women exist only for men's sexual pleasure and to bear their babies and men exist to have authority in all other areas, even though it flies in the face of reality, that we can't see straight. And, I know that people think this is a "single" issue that ignores all the other "really important" ones. But, those same people assume that we aren't grappling with the basics, when for women, we clearly are. That -- equal access to fundamental rights regardless of gender -- is the single issue. It is indeed a good time to draw a line.
Draw the Line -- Sign the Bill -- SPREAD THE WORD is the name of this video which is part of a Center of Reproductive Rights campaign to educate people about why reproductive rights are human rights.
Do you think these issues are unrelated to jobs, to health, to freedom from violence, to the economy? To democracy?
You might think people like me are being dramatic. I'll make you a deal... if paying attention to the news isn't making you think about moving to another country for a while, consider reading It's Even Worse Than It Looks. Or this. Or this. Or this. Or this. If you still think the same thing, I will happily vie for a statue of a naked man coated in gold on a shiny black pedestal thingy.
I'm really trying to understand what people who don't think this is important and necessary to address are thinking? To try and answer this question, I've been doing things like grilling my conservative friends relentlessly and asking people in check-out lines, "Do you think it's important for a woman to decide when she can and should have a baby?" or unsuspecting joggers, "Do you really think Viagra should be covered by insurance companies, but not birth control pills?" or taxi drivers, "Should legislators, who don't know what "trans" means and can't say the word "vaginal" be mandating medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasounds for women?" I'm just curious. I found out a few things anecdotally but very consistently:
I mean -- if you are a man -- imagine some of these scenarios: people comparing you to animals while they decide what you can and cannot do with your very own penis and testes? (I can use those scientific and anatomically correct words outside of U.S. legislative chambers, so it's OK.) Or, your government mandating a trans-rectal probe that is not medically necessary as a way to shame and intimidate you out of a decisions? Without your consent? How about saying that producing sperm is in effect a "pre-existing condition?" Or that doctors can lie to you to make sure you don't do something you want to do with our body? Or making you pay through physical assault, or pain of death? Or that pharmacists can simply refuse to sell you condoms when you've run out to by them in a pinch. It's too absurd for words -- unless you are a woman in a Republican-led state in the last year and a half. Actually, it's really 30+ years, but that's a whole other story.
What people seem to believe is that women are morally incompetent children who need to have their decisions made for them. So, they find ways to make sure that this most fundamental human right is constantly being mediated by others for women -- legislators, doctors, pharmacists, police officers, nurses, legislators who were vets, legislators whose fathers were vets, legislators who were farmers, legislators who fancy themselves doctors, legislators who think they are stand-up comedians, legislators who think they're divine kings -- you know, pretty much anyone but the woman's whose body is involved in the decision.
As Lori Day recently pointed out it is more important now than ever to call people on everyday sexism, racism or whatever form of bigotry they're masking in a perverted patriotism -- especially when these things become manifest in laws. People need to stop being polite and have difficult, open conversations. Or we're in for a shock. Last week, at an excellent Amnesty International XX Factor Town Hall on Women's Rights, Jenni Williams founder of Women of Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA) said that we should not take our rights for granted and needed to stand clearly in defense of those rights. She wasn't talking about Zimbabweans, but Americans.
This is why the first presidential debate's complete ignorance, in both ways, of "women's issues," was so stunning. I don't know what President Obama's team of crack strategists was thinking. It was beyond ridiculous. Jobs? Health care? Work? The economy? Fundamental rights? Both candidates talked about these things as though we all have equal access to them when we don't. That fact has been a central theme of the election cycle. The entire performance was a surreal denial of the reality of women's lives in this country. And bad for the Democrats. And so for the polls.
As Zerlina Maxwell put it the day after in The New York Daily News: "A debate that was supposed to be focused on domestic policy seems to forget that women's rights -- affordable access to contraception, preventative health care, the right to choose -- are domestic policy. Women are half the country but largely forgotten about in last night's debate. It seems that everyone participating in last night's debate, including debate moderator Jim Lehrer, forgot that women have the right to vote." And, I would add, men who understand the implications.
If you are really feeling clickavistic today, pass these videos along and support the American Association of University Women's Twitter campaign to get @MittRomney and @BarackObama to talk about women in the debates. In addition, several organizations, such as Ultraviolet, have set up online applications where you can submit your own questions to the candidates. But really, sit down and talk to a Republican voter who thinks of themselves as moderate and honestly believes that today's Republican party is the same one they voted for in past years. Because it not and we will all pay the consequences.
Follow Soraya Chemaly on Twitter: www.twitter.com/schemaly
![]() |
![]() |
|
Obama | Romney | |
---|---|---|
Electoral Votes (270 to win) |
332 | 206 |
Obama | Romney | |
---|---|---|
Total | 65,899,660 | 60,932,152 |
Percent | 51.1% | 47.2% |
Democrats* | Republicans | |
---|---|---|
Current Senate | 53 | 47 |
Seats gained or lost | +2 | -2 |
New Total | 55 | 45 |
Democrats | Republicans | |
---|---|---|
Seats won | 201 | 234 |
#5 and #6
The only way I would be prepared to pay for someone elses' method of contraception is if that person is receiving taxpayer funded government benefits for which they did not contribute--i.e. not social security or medicare. In that case the contraception should be both mandatory and involuntary. A woman gets an implant or iud removed only when neither she or her children no longer require government assistance. Any female dependent children of the beneficiary who are fertile must also accept the non-voluntary contraceptive in order for any benefits to the family to remain in effect.
That being is an amalgam of both the mother's and father's DNA. Both have an equal say, along with the new being, in what happens next.
Being an Atheist, I will continue to defer to science and Mother Nature, inconvenient as it is to political ideology on either the Right or Left.
"The War on Women: Day by Day"
http://emilyslist.org/waronwomen
And yours is another awesome post, Soraya. Thank you.
My insurance, which I purchase, pays for my neighbor's lung Cancer from smoking, my cousin's diabetes from overeating, and my co-worker's surgery from falling asleep at the wheel. These same folks are keen on loudly proclaiming how they don't want to pay for contraception for THEIR neighbors, cousins and co-workers.
Freedom. The right to our own property. (My body is my property.) These rights are systematically being taken from me and my sisters, and many are working to continue this terror.
I've signed the petition.
Worse than Darwinism, we've moved on to 'survival of the most manipulative'.
Reproduction is not an illness, nor is it a pre-existing condition. It is a conscious choice made by a woman, many of whom want to bear no responsibility for the choice they make. As another woman it is not my responsibility to pay for your birth control method. Nor is it your employer's.
If you need help paying for your prescription, may I suggest you go to the other half of the reason you need one and ask him to pay for his part in the process.
Until we could afford children we did not have them. We have never used a government stipend to care for our children our ourselves. Now that is responsibility.
This is not a question of what a person's religous beliefs are. It is a question of whether or not a person that pays taxes is entitled to receive what they want for the money they spend. Every person in this world pays taxes in one fashion or the other. Some pay by a third party, some by direct payment. There are State, local, federal and international taxes that are paid. Some pay by simply purchasing a product that was taxed by another country or even our own. So all women are doing is expecting a return on their investment in taxes.
Why should Churches be tax exempt and have the authority to deny what others' taxes are spent on?
Draw the Line, People.
Can government be allowed to decide if you abuse it with cocaine, meth, herion in your own home?
Birth control is as available as it has been, nothing has changed. Most states already require insurance companies to cover birth control, and a few have exceptions for religious organization. Which seems to be a perfectly rational way of doing things.
However, in many cases BC is not necessary to living a healthy life. Sex is a choice. If you choose to have sex, then you should choose to protect yourself. And in most cases your BC is covered, but if it is not I should not be required to subsidize your BC.
The justification for ending a life because it is a choice is ridiculous. Lets all be honest about what it really is, ending life. Stop calling it a choice. We have a 19% rate national, and a 48% rate among Blacks nationally. In some cities the Black abortion rate is above 50%. How can anyone be ok with this? Howcan anyone justify the destruction of life and possibly a race of people?
Be honest and stop calling abortion reproductive rights and pro-choice. It is absolutely and only destruction of life.
How can you justify this? How can you claim to stand for women's rights, when you advocate for the destruction of life, in particular unborn women? Where are those rights? Where are the rights of the man who may not want the abortion, should he not have a say in the matter?
As long as Planned Parenthood offers abortion service of any kind, they should be defunded. Take a look at Margaret Sanger, she was a horrible individual. Marxist, Eugenist, and Rac!st. That's who she was, read her own writings.
I do not believe in banning abortion and you are right that some of the laws may go to far. However, I can never stand with any legislation that advocates the destruction of life.
Poor choices do not justify ending life. There are consequences for your actions and sex is not a risk free activity.
Instead of continually telling women it is ok to destroy life because it's their body and their choice, we should work to find solutions to the problems that lead women to those decisions. Maybe it's restoring the family unit, maybe it's more BC, maybe it's better education, I dont have all the answers. But I do know a 54% rate in DC and 48% nationally for black women is a very troublesome number. There is a better way.
Contraceptive coverage and gynecologic treatment I can wholeheartedly agree should be treated exactly the same as any other healthcare coverage, including the previously referenced blue pills. That seems only fair and equal, after all.
Abortion, or free choice, is not necessarily so cut and dried. The issue really comes down to equal protection and definitions. When does life begin? It is entirely possible that we as a nation or a human race will never arrive at a definition that satisfies everyone, or even a significant majority for that matter. But at whatever point an individual defines life as beginning at, it becomes worthy of protection. Or, to put it another way, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life..." Yes, there are certainly some/many attempting to maintain some kind of control or establish paternalistic laws, but just as much there are those who sincerely believe they are protecting an unalienable right.
The devil is, of course, in the details. And compromise or accomodation seems unlikely on an issue as fraught with emotion and very strongly held convictions as this.
The question " when does life begin" has now been answered scientifically. Life begins when the DNA of the genotype expresses the correct phenotype. And the earliest proof of when that is true is at birth.
http://www.naturalabortionlaws.com