iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Soraya Chemaly

GET UPDATES FROM Soraya Chemaly
 

Is it Your Body or Not? Draw The Line, People

Posted: 10/09/2012 8:02 pm

If you are reading this then you are using your body.

If you vote, you do that with your body, too.

Actually, let's skip the dualism, your body is you. Somehow, a large percentage of people in this country have forgotten that idea. That their bodies are theirs but that yours is yours.

These people remember.

Sometimes people just need a simple reminder so you might want to pass this, and the one below, along. And another lest-we-forget, in order to get and keep jobs and earn money and participate in the economy, women need to control their reproduction, safely and legally, and have access to health care that includes their reproductive organs. You know, the ones in their bodies. Even if men don't have the same ones in theirs.

If a person cannot control her own reproduction, well, really what can she control? What good are all your other rights if your right to control your own body and reproduction is denied? How else do you think we are ever going to deal pervasive gender inequities in the business world? Pathetic representation of women in government? You know what "glass ceilings" are held up by? Systemic complementarianism enabled by legislatively enforced reproductive injustice. There are so many people so deeply bound to a conservative, religiously-inspired belief that women exist only for men's sexual pleasure and to bear their babies and men exist to have authority in all other areas, even though it flies in the face of reality, that we can't see straight. And, I know that people think this is a "single" issue that ignores all the other "really important" ones. But, those same people assume that we aren't grappling with the basics, when for women, we clearly are. That -- equal access to fundamental rights regardless of gender -- is the single issue. It is indeed a good time to draw a line.

Draw the Line -- Sign the Bill -- SPREAD THE WORD is the name of this video which is part of a Center of Reproductive Rights campaign to educate people about why reproductive rights are human rights.


Do you think these issues are unrelated to jobs, to health, to freedom from violence, to the economy? To democracy?

You might think people like me are being dramatic. I'll make you a deal... if paying attention to the news isn't making you think about moving to another country for a while, consider reading It's Even Worse Than It Looks. Or this. Or this. Or this. Or this. If you still think the same thing, I will happily vie for a statue of a naked man coated in gold on a shiny black pedestal thingy.

I'm really trying to understand what people who don't think this is important and necessary to address are thinking? To try and answer this question, I've been doing things like grilling my conservative friends relentlessly and asking people in check-out lines, "Do you think it's important for a woman to decide when she can and should have a baby?" or unsuspecting joggers, "Do you really think Viagra should be covered by insurance companies, but not birth control pills?" or taxi drivers, "Should legislators, who don't know what "trans" means and can't say the word "vaginal" be mandating medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasounds for women?" I'm just curious. I found out a few things anecdotally but very consistently:

  1. People think that a person's reproductive decisions are private. Imagine that.
  2. People don't understand that Republican legislators don't agree with this idea if the people in question are women. They don't know the degree to which, state-by-state, Republican legislators have systematically attacked women's rights to privacy, bodily integrity and autonomy through the introduction and passage of more than 1200 bills and laws in the past 18 months.
  3. People are not getting the information they need to make informed decisions. They don't know about mandatory ultrasounds, waiting periods, taxes on abortions, rapists with the right to sue for custody, "legitimate" rape laws, the impact of violence against women, the reality of unfair pay. They think MItt Romney's strapping the dog to the roof story to drive to Canada is not true. It is. Really. Ask Gail Collins.
  4. People don't believe we can go backwards. They don't take threats to Roe v. Wade seriously, despite the explicit intent of radicals in charge of the GOP "social" agenda, they don't understand the implications for women's personhood and equality of personhood-for-fetus inflused legislation (also embraced by the GOP platform).
  5. People cannot even imagine a world where women actually have access, unfettered, to control of birth. Does it not strike anyone as just plain wrong that men can control their reproduction by running down the the corner store and spending a pittance, but that women need doctors, prescriptions, scary small print, friendly pharmacists, clinics, deep pocket books, time, tarot cards, perfectly aligned stars and government representatives who aren't personally scared of women's sexual freedom?
  6. People are so immersed in seeing the world through male norms that they don't understand the effects on work, insurance and health care decisions. Effectively, the way we live now, women are just non-men and pay a high price.

I mean -- if you are a man -- imagine some of these scenarios: people comparing you to animals while they decide what you can and cannot do with your very own penis and testes? (I can use those scientific and anatomically correct words outside of U.S. legislative chambers, so it's OK.) Or, your government mandating a trans-rectal probe that is not medically necessary as a way to shame and intimidate you out of a decisions? Without your consent? How about saying that producing sperm is in effect a "pre-existing condition?" Or that doctors can lie to you to make sure you don't do something you want to do with our body? Or making you pay through physical assault, or pain of death? Or that pharmacists can simply refuse to sell you condoms when you've run out to by them in a pinch. It's too absurd for words -- unless you are a woman in a Republican-led state in the last year and a half. Actually, it's really 30+ years, but that's a whole other story.

What people seem to believe is that women are morally incompetent children who need to have their decisions made for them. So, they find ways to make sure that this most fundamental human right is constantly being mediated by others for women -- legislators, doctors, pharmacists, police officers, nurses, legislators who were vets, legislators whose fathers were vets, legislators who were farmers, legislators who fancy themselves doctors, legislators who think they are stand-up comedians, legislators who think they're divine kings -- you know, pretty much anyone but the woman's whose body is involved in the decision.

As Lori Day recently pointed out it is more important now than ever to call people on everyday sexism, racism or whatever form of bigotry they're masking in a perverted patriotism -- especially when these things become manifest in laws. People need to stop being polite and have difficult, open conversations. Or we're in for a shock. Last week, at an excellent Amnesty International XX Factor Town Hall on Women's Rights, Jenni Williams founder of Women of Zimbabwe Arise (WOZA) said that we should not take our rights for granted and needed to stand clearly in defense of those rights. She wasn't talking about Zimbabweans, but Americans.

This is why the first presidential debate's complete ignorance, in both ways, of "women's issues," was so stunning. I don't know what President Obama's team of crack strategists was thinking. It was beyond ridiculous. Jobs? Health care? Work? The economy? Fundamental rights? Both candidates talked about these things as though we all have equal access to them when we don't. That fact has been a central theme of the election cycle. The entire performance was a surreal denial of the reality of women's lives in this country. And bad for the Democrats. And so for the polls.

As Zerlina Maxwell put it the day after in The New York Daily News: "A debate that was supposed to be focused on domestic policy seems to forget that women's rights -- affordable access to contraception, preventative health care, the right to choose -- are domestic policy. Women are half the country but largely forgotten about in last night's debate. It seems that everyone participating in last night's debate, including debate moderator Jim Lehrer, forgot that women have the right to vote." And, I would add, men who understand the implications.

If you are really feeling clickavistic today, pass these videos along and support the American Association of University Women's Twitter campaign to get @MittRomney and @BarackObama to talk about women in the debates. In addition, several organizations, such as Ultraviolet, have set up online applications where you can submit your own questions to the candidates. But really, sit down and talk to a Republican voter who thinks of themselves as moderate and honestly believes that today's Republican party is the same one they voted for in past years. Because it not and we will all pay the consequences.


 

Follow Soraya Chemaly on Twitter: www.twitter.com/schemaly

FOLLOW POLITICS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 329
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:57 PM on 10/17/2012
WOW, Ms. Chemaly, just wow.

#5 and #6
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
12:19 PM on 10/15/2012
A woman's body is her own up until the minute she conceives. Then she is sharing it with another completely separate entity belonging to both herself and the father. Society didn't make up these rules. Mother nature did.

The only way I would be prepared to pay for someone elses' method of contraception is if that person is receiving taxpayer funded government benefits for which they did not contribute--i.e. not social security or medicare. In that case the contraception should be both mandatory and involuntary. A woman gets an implant or iud removed only when neither she or her children no longer require government assistance. Any female dependent children of the beneficiary who are fertile must also accept the non-voluntary contraceptive in order for any benefits to the family to remain in effect.
04:59 PM on 10/17/2012
A fetus is an organism feeding off the woman carrying it. It is not an individual living being and has no rights that supersede the woman. If you think it should you do not believe women should have complete control over their bodies. The ONLY relevant issue in debating the right to choose is body autonomy (and right to privacy).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
06:48 PM on 10/17/2012
I will defer my opinion to the most discreet and detailed science available.  Once that fetus becomes an observable entity, the mother becomes a host distinct from the living being she cradles.

That being is an amalgam of both the mother's and father's DNA. Both have an equal say, along with the new being, in what happens next.

Being an Atheist, I will continue to defer to science and Mother Nature, inconvenient as it is to political ideology on either the Right or Left.   
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
12:29 PM on 10/20/2012
Sure glad you don'thave a say out my body. Your authoritarian concept of what is acceptable make me shudder.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
01:52 PM on 10/10/2012
An interactive day by day timeline of the war on women.

"The War on Women: Day by Day"
http://emilyslist.org/waronwomen
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Soraya Chemaly
Writer
02:16 PM on 10/10/2012
This is a terrific resource.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:51 PM on 10/10/2012
Ditto.

And yours is another awesome post, Soraya. Thank you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dev Austin
Haters are my motivators
01:27 PM on 10/10/2012
It's the lack of media attention to 50% of this nation that leads to ignorance. Almost daily there is an article about Latino voters and how important they are to the candidates but what about the women voters and their issues? Are they not important to the candidates? There was once a rush of articles about the 'war on women' and it's almost like they think it's over. Women should be up in arms about being pushed back into the unimportant category once again.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
10:52 AM on 10/13/2012
Rachel Maddow covers this topic religiously.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dev Austin
Haters are my motivators
09:50 AM on 10/14/2012
Unfortunately not enough, already in the dark about the issue, watch Rachel.
12:02 PM on 10/10/2012
A few stated women should have reproductive rights but should be responsible. Isn't that the whole point! Women are in fact just as much sexual beings as men. They are entitled to have sex just as much as men it is society that has developed the sexual deviance norm of women having sex freely. There are many states already cover BC so this isn't a new idea. Company's such as United Health Care, and Blue Cross Blue Shield cover BC under a premium that the women who have insurance already pay. If you do not believe in contraception then do not use it. It really is that easy! My husband and I share the same health plan and we are both the same age and neither one of us have pre-exhisting conditions yet I still pay $40 more just because I am a woman. With the inflated prices of health insurance costs BC should be covered especially since in most cases Viagra is. Interesting because Viagra has no health benefits other than for sexual arousal when BC has many health benefits other than family planning such as treatment for endometrosis, etc.. Not to mention that it decreases abortion rates, and unplanned pregnancy's. Women are not asking for a free ride they are asking for BC to be more affordable and covered under a already inflated health plan premiums. Religious organizations can not choose what a independent non-religious company chooses to cover.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Soraya Chemaly
Writer
02:17 PM on 10/10/2012
Thank you for this very clear explanation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
08:05 PM on 10/10/2012
fanned
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rda1911a1
God Bless John Browning
12:01 PM on 10/10/2012
I'm all for letting a woman do what she wants with her body. Including Hooking and shooting drugs into it. However don't ask me to fund her iresponsible behavior
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russell C Crawford
12:21 PM on 10/10/2012
You need to think about what you say. Women are taxpayers like everyone else. The part you don't seem to understand is that they pay their taxes and men then choose how the taxes are spend. Don't you think that a woman should get a return on her tax money, especially if she is paying in and mostly male legislatures are then taking her money and spending it the way they want?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dev Austin
Haters are my motivators
01:21 PM on 10/10/2012
How are you funding her behavior and what about his behavior?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
11:07 AM on 10/10/2012
The government does not own my body or anyone else's body. Legislating my reproductive rights is a form of slavery where I am beholden to the government for when I have children and how many I should have. There are those in the government who want to take away my choice(s). I still have some legal rights, but in some states they are restricting those legal rights and paving the way for total contol over my choices.

My insurance, which I purchase, pays for my neighbor's lung Cancer from smoking, my cousin's diabetes from overeating, and my co-worker's surgery from falling asleep at the wheel. These same folks are keen on loudly proclaiming how they don't want to pay for contraception for THEIR neighbors, cousins and co-workers.

Freedom. The right to our own property. (My body is my property.) These rights are systematically being taken from me and my sisters, and many are working to continue this terror.

I've signed the petition.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Seven Teenatheart
Tolerance, peace, and sanity. Be your own person.
01:38 PM on 10/10/2012
Beautifully stated.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
07:45 PM on 10/10/2012
TY ;-)
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Soraya Chemaly
Writer
02:17 PM on 10/10/2012
Amen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bradlinsky
Concept Other Than Self
10:42 AM on 10/10/2012
As I read through your list I'm struck by the fact that the vast majority of people just aren't that educated, or knowledgeable. In this great society, if the people aren't educated enough to govern themselves, then the shysters and con artists will happily step in and take advantage of them. Unfortunately, the REST OF US are taken advantage of, as well, because we are at the mercy of whoever the 'majority' elects.

Worse than Darwinism, we've moved on to 'survival of the most manipulative'.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
08:07 PM on 10/10/2012
good point
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
09:20 AM on 10/10/2012
Throughout the entire article Chemaly articulated all the rights a woman should have. Noticably missing, however, was the word "responsibility;" as in I am responsible for saying "no I will not have sex" if I cannot afford my birth control pills this month.

Reproduction is not an illness, nor is it a pre-existing condition. It is a conscious choice made by a woman, many of whom want to bear no responsibility for the choice they make. As another woman it is not my responsibility to pay for your birth control method. Nor is it your employer's.

If you need help paying for your prescription, may I suggest you go to the other half of the reason you need one and ask him to pay for his part in the process.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrawiz
Holding the Middle Ground
11:03 AM on 10/10/2012
If there was anyone in dire need of taking a Biology 101 course it's you. Gee, you think that might be why you couldn't get a date to save your soul? Thank God the world is safe from you reproducing!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
02:49 PM on 10/10/2012
So personal smear is the riposte of choice from the left now? I don't know you, so how do you know me? I am a (happily) married woman with two adult children and an MBA. Yes, I took both high school and college biology. No one but my husband and I paid for our birth control, nor did we expect anyone else to.

Until we could afford children we did not have them. We have never used a government stipend to care for our children our ourselves. Now that is responsibility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
11:06 AM on 10/10/2012
Punishing people for having sex is certainly not a part of our land of the free. Women pay for their insurance and deserve contraception to be included just as other prescription medicines are inluded.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lrobb
Gold Standard = four paws and a tail
02:50 PM on 10/10/2012
No one is arguing that women can't pay for their insurance. I am saying their employer should not have to pay for birth control pills when used for contraceptive purposes only.
09:19 AM on 10/10/2012
People have the right to buy birth control. They have the right to purchase insurance that covers the cost of birth control. However, the government does not have the right to force Catholics to pay for something we all know they disagree with. It is as simple as that. One would think this party would appreciate and defend the differences between religions and spiritual beliefs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russell C Crawford
10:51 AM on 10/10/2012
Women pay taxes and they should get a return on those taxes. The Catholic Church does not pay taxes.
This is not a question of what a person's religous beliefs are. It is a question of whether or not a person that pays taxes is entitled to receive what they want for the money they spend. Every person in this world pays taxes in one fashion or the other. Some pay by a third party, some by direct payment. There are State, local, federal and international taxes that are paid. Some pay by simply purchasing a product that was taxed by another country or even our own. So all women are doing is expecting a return on their investment in taxes.
Why should Churches be tax exempt and have the authority to deny what others' taxes are spent on?
02:36 PM on 10/10/2012
Russell, I suggest you get adult supervision. Taxes and insurance are not one in the same.
10:56 AM on 10/10/2012
No one is forcing Catholics to pay for something they disagree with. They are forcing the insurance providers to cover birth control in their plan, which they probably do for other employers for which they provide insurance. HEALTH INSURANCE IS AN EARNED BENEFIT. It's like saying anyone employed by the Catholic church can't spend their wages on condoms. Out-effing-rageous that people are still buying into this narrative that somehow people will be forced to pay for birth control. Do you not even have a rudimentary knowledge of how insurance works? Good God.
11:19 AM on 10/10/2012
"Good God"... DO NOT force the Catholic Church or the Catholic Schools and Universities to carry insurance that covers birth control. What don't you get?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
11:58 AM on 10/10/2012
FF
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
09:13 AM on 10/10/2012
Is it Your Body or Not?

Draw the Line, People.

Can government be allowed to decide if you abuse it with cocaine, meth, herion in your own home?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dev Austin
Haters are my motivators
01:33 PM on 10/10/2012
Why is it that reproductive healthcare for women is associated with drug use? It really makes your whole idea kind of off the mark.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Soraya Chemaly
Writer
02:20 PM on 10/10/2012
So interesting that you associate reproduction with shameful, illegal behaviors. Not a relevant connection at all, of course. Just saying.
photo
RUKidding0
Freedom is Fundamental
03:07 PM on 10/10/2012
The connection is your body and what you choose to do with it.
01:19 AM on 10/11/2012
I do think that illegal drug use is illegal because it's a money-spinner that way. Calling drug use "shameful" is a sign of being indoctrinated. Lots of Catholics would use the exact same word to talk about sex.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lori Day
Educational psychologist and consultant
08:26 AM on 10/10/2012
It is so important that people understand the connection between women's reproductive rights and their economic participation. Restricting abortion and birth control restricts a woman's ENTIRE LIFE. If a woman can't control her child bearing, she ends up with more mouths to feed and less economic opportunity, which, paradoxically, is then needed even more to feed the mouths she was forced to bring into the world against her well and against her better judgment. Another word for all of this is POVERTY. This is how the cycle of poverty continues. Because, after all, it's poor women we are really talking about. Women of means always have, and always will, be able to obtain whatever they need for their health and well-being, and to remain in the work force. Why on Earth do we want more poor women having more babies when they don't want them? The same people who are essentially pushing for that are the ones advocating against food stamps and all other so-called entitlements for the poor. We are indeed a schizophrenic country! Thank you Soraya, for being once again a voice of sanity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
10:35 AM on 10/10/2012
Excellent
11:20 AM on 10/10/2012
As much as i am pro-choice, it is offensive to hear you talk about abortion as birth control. Especially when the fetus is 6 months old, it is anything but birth control. Freedom entails responsibility. i understand accident and mistake. I also know there are morning avter pills. In my book, a woman seeking her 2d abortion lacks basic self responsibility and I'm not sure I want her in a position of judgment and authority.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lori Day
Educational psychologist and consultant
05:28 PM on 10/10/2012
Excuse me. Where in my comment did I talk about abortion as birth control?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Lori Day
Educational psychologist and consultant
08:31 PM on 10/10/2012
Where did I talk about abortion as birth control? Please point that out to me in my comment.
08:25 AM on 10/10/2012
Women have rights. I have not seen anyone stopping women from buying birthcontrol. If you want to have sex with who ever you choose I have not seen any one trying to stop them. You have your rights. Now it comes down to keep out of my vagina but when I chose to have sex you should pay for it. I have the right to own a weapon who will pay for it. You can do whatever you like with your body. Have an abortion or kick your feet in the air as much as you want but I do not want to pay for it. This does not mean you do not have the right to do it. So this is not a fight for rights it is a fight for who pays for what.
09:20 AM on 10/10/2012
Very well said.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dev Austin
Haters are my motivators
01:35 PM on 10/10/2012
Only if you want to display the ignorance of men about this issue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
10:37 AM on 10/10/2012
Hyde amendment forbids tax money paying for abortions. Women buy their insurance which is why contraception is included in the ACA. Howm is it you pay for women's bodies?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
southrnlyfe
07:00 AM on 10/10/2012
First of all, there is no War on women. This is a fabricated lie.
Birth control is as available as it has been, nothing has changed. Most states already require insurance companies to cover birth control, and a few have exceptions for religious organization. Which seems to be a perfectly rational way of doing things.
However, in many cases BC is not necessary to living a healthy life. Sex is a choice. If you choose to have sex, then you should choose to protect yourself. And in most cases your BC is covered, but if it is not I should not be required to subsidize your BC.

The justification for ending a life because it is a choice is ridiculous. Lets all be honest about what it really is, ending life. Stop calling it a choice. We have a 19% rate national, and a 48% rate among Blacks nationally. In some cities the Black abortion rate is above 50%. How can anyone be ok with this? Howcan anyone justify the destruction of life and possibly a race of people?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
10:41 AM on 10/10/2012
War On Women by those who insist their beleifs give them the right to take away women's rights. Planned Parenthood is totally being defunded in two states. The avalanche of restrictive anti-abortion laws in the past decade has curbed reproductive rights of American women and led to deep differences by region, according to a new study by the Guttmacher Institute.“Fully 55 percent of women of reproductive age in the United States live in one of the 29 states considered hostile to abortion,” Guttmacher reported, includingmultiple laws that require waiting periods, mandate pre-abortion counseling with a hostile focus, require ultrasound tests when there is no medical need. Eighty such laws were enacted in the first half of 2011, an additional 39 in the first six months of this year. (Guttmacher )
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:07 AM on 10/10/2012
yep, like my friend who is a scientist / researcher would say 'let the data speak'.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
southrnlyfe
01:52 PM on 10/10/2012
I love it.
Be honest and stop calling abortion reproductive rights and pro-choice. It is absolutely and only destruction of life.
How can you justify this? How can you claim to stand for women's rights, when you advocate for the destruction of life, in particular unborn women? Where are those rights? Where are the rights of the man who may not want the abortion, should he not have a say in the matter?
As long as Planned Parenthood offers abortion service of any kind, they should be defunded. Take a look at Margaret Sanger, she was a horrible individual. Marxist, Eugenist, and Rac!st. That's who she was, read her own writings.
I do not believe in banning abortion and you are right that some of the laws may go to far. However, I can never stand with any legislation that advocates the destruction of life.
Poor choices do not justify ending life. There are consequences for your actions and sex is not a risk free activity.
Instead of continually telling women it is ok to destroy life because it's their body and their choice, we should work to find solutions to the problems that lead women to those decisions. Maybe it's restoring the family unit, maybe it's more BC, maybe it's better education, I dont have all the answers. But I do know a 54% rate in DC and 48% nationally for black women is a very troublesome number. There is a better way.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Soraya Chemaly
Writer
12:04 PM on 10/10/2012
I'm finding this fascination with birth control provisions really interesting. As I said above, the point of this argument is that women don't have equal access to equal protections under the law, not to debate the pros and cons of birth control. However, to your point regarding employers and insurance. Employers pay for all kinds of things via insurance that they might not use/need for themselves - that is the nature of pooling resources as we do with insurance. The issue with birth control is that it has to do with sex and shame and who doles out control of both. To say that denying women birth control coverage isn't cherry picking based on male norms and patriarchal religious mediation of sex and reproduction is disingenuous. The Republican party's explicitly stated intent - Paul Ryan, innumerable representatives, Supreme Court advisors, the party platform - is to do this. If the inclusion of personhood in the party platform is not scaring you then you don't understand what it means...most forms of birth control would be eliminated if this scenario is taken to the conclusion that they describe as desirous, in vitro technologies? Poof. Safe and legal abortion. Gone. If you are so concerned with life and who ends it, consider the trillions we spend on the military and who is morally incompetent then. If you are so concerned with stopping abortions the answer is super simple...pass out free birth control and the problem all but goes away.
01:34 AM on 10/10/2012
Perhaps I'm playing devil's advocate here, or perhaps I don't understand (and I say that seriously), but...

Contraceptive coverage and gynecologic treatment I can wholeheartedly agree should be treated exactly the same as any other healthcare coverage, including the previously referenced blue pills. That seems only fair and equal, after all.

Abortion, or free choice, is not necessarily so cut and dried. The issue really comes down to equal protection and definitions. When does life begin? It is entirely possible that we as a nation or a human race will never arrive at a definition that satisfies everyone, or even a significant majority for that matter. But at whatever point an individual defines life as beginning at, it becomes worthy of protection. Or, to put it another way, "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life..." Yes, there are certainly some/many attempting to maintain some kind of control or establish paternalistic laws, but just as much there are those who sincerely believe they are protecting an unalienable right.

The devil is, of course, in the details. And compromise or accomodation seems unlikely on an issue as fraught with emotion and very strongly held convictions as this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Russell C Crawford
06:38 AM on 10/10/2012
"When does life begin?"
The question " when does life begin" has now been answered scientifically. Life begins when the DNA of the genotype expresses the correct phenotype. And the earliest proof of when that is true is at birth.
http://www.naturalabortionlaws.com
11:22 AM on 10/10/2012
but when does life at the cellular level advance to the point that the developing life ferm is sufficiently human to be afforded human rights, and at what point does the fetus' right take precedence over the rights of the mother.
04:29 PM on 10/10/2012
But is there a difference between when life begins and when it can be identified or proven? Is that a purely scientific question? My problem with this debate, as it exists today, is that neither side seems willing to accept that there may be people on the other that are just as well-intentioned as they see themselves as. It's no easier, perhaps, to define life than to define death; do we define it by clinical death, biological death or brain death? The three may often essentially coincide, but what of the cases where they don't?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
giftsthatpurr
zestful life
10:43 AM on 10/10/2012
Seems those who would decide for women what women should do with their own bodies forget that women are "life" and are supposedly protected by the constitution too. Incidentally, abortion is legal by law of the land.
04:26 PM on 10/10/2012
I'm not trying to decide anything for anyone. Personally, I don't think I really stand on either side of the issue for two reasons. First because I'm not a woman, so I know full well that I will never have to face that particular decision and don't feel equipped to judge those who have or may. Second because I'm not sure at what point "life" actually begins. The point I'm trying to make is that, dependent on personal point of view, there is a very real possibility for the fundamental rights of two people to be in conflict.